Submitted by Richard Smith on November 25, 2015 - 09:27
Meshing in a single, integrated simulation environment (e.g., Caedium) for Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is different, in a good way, from meshing in a dedicated mesh or post-processing tool. An integrated CFD simulation environment has the standard meshing tools, but in addition upstream you have a full geometry engine to create and modify geometry as needed, and downstream you can use the same meshing tools for visualization, such as seeds for streamlines and surfaces for results interpolation. You are not forced into a linear progression through the CFD simulation process, because often it requires multiple visits backwards and forwards (non-linear) through the tool chain to get to a final result. Also the visualization of mesh metrics (e.g., surface mesh quality) is identical to general flow field visualization (e.g., pressure), which minimizes the number of concepts you need to learn.
Submitted by Richard Smith on November 19, 2015 - 14:54
Given the option, it is often better to create geometry specifically for your Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. It is even better if your CFD system supports geometry creation. Then you can stay within a single integrated simulation environment for your entire task without the need to learn or purchase additional software packages.
Submitted by Richard Smith on October 22, 2015 - 10:30
If fluid flow is a primary driver for your design project then Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is likely to be a cost effective way to help meet your goals. You could outsource your CFD to consultants, but in the long run it usually pays to do it yourself.
Submitted by Richard Smith on September 1, 2015 - 15:44
I don’t think anyone would argue with the fact that paper airplanes are simple (and fun!), but what is the simplest paper airplane that can still fly? I give you a single rectangular piece of paper without any folds that will gently spin around its longest horizontal axis if released with a long edge parallel to the ground. Next, what is the simplest Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method that can capture the essence of the spinning paper? I give you the Moving Reference Frame (MRF, also known as the frozen rotor method) option for CFD. Combine the two and you arrive at an interesting simulation of a simple phenomenon.
CFD Simulation of a Rotating Paper SheetVelocity vectors at 90 degrees
Submitted by Richard Smith on August 12, 2015 - 10:40
New to Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)? Then you've come to the right place. Becoming productive in CFD can be a daunting task. However, as with all long term goals, if you break it down into smaller, achievable tasks, in no time you'll be up to speed and ready for production level work. Assuming you are familiar with the fluid dynamics of your application, then let's begin.