Aerodynamic Performance of a Stationary Bicycle
Aerodynamics plays a crucial role in the performance characteristics of outdoor cycling. However, no-one to my knowledge has used Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to analyze the aerodynamic performance of a stationary bicycle - at least until now!
The obvious condition to investigate for a stationary bicycle is a headwind. However, equally important to consider are crosswinds (yaw), which can play havoc with outdoor group cycling. To account for all possible wind conditions I used CFD to simulate a full 360-degree sweep in 10 degree increments, equivalent to different orientations of the bicycle.
The original model for the analysis came from SketchUp 3D Warehouse and is a worst case scenario, in terms of drag, with the cyclist drinking from a water bottle in an upright position.
Remarkably the drag of the stationary bicycle was the same value for all angles of orientation as shown above. Even more remarkable was that the drag was zero - an outdoor cyclist's dream.
Unfortunately the streamlines around the stationary bicycle for the headwind condition (orientation = 0 degrees) do not reveal any details about the overall air flow.
This CFD study shows that a stationary bicycle does not experience any drag force. Further this phenomenon is independent of the orientation (angle) of the bicycle.
Given the remarkable findings of this analysis it is always a good idea to see another independent study for validation, so I eagerly await wind tunnel test confirmation of these results.
To further explore the effect (or lack of it) of drag on stationary bicycles I intend to use CFD to simulate a full aerodynamic setup that includes a cyclist wearing a skinsuit and an aerodynamic helmet.
Recent blog posts
- External Aerodynamics with CFD
- A Case for Renaming the Navier-Stokes Equations
- Ludwig Prandtl: Real Fluids Explained
- Osborne Reynolds: A Giant in Fluid Dynamics
- Sliver Treatment Strategies for CFD
- How to Fix Small Acute Angles for CFD
- Small Feature Removal for CFD
- Fluid Visualization in Nature
- Design is Compromise
- CFD Is Not Enough