Simulation for Illustration
Sometimes an accurate simulation of a realistic scenario such as the aerodynamics of a racecar, is too much. Sometimes all that is needed is a simulation that highlights a simple concept or idea – welcome to simulation for illustration.
Engineers require high-fidelity simulations such as those produced by Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) to make crucial product design decisions. At the other end of the simulation spectrum are movies, where aesthetic considerations override reality – how many cute, talking animals have you seen outside of the movie theater? Somewhere in-between these two extremes are technical illustrations that serve to explain physical phenomenon (such as the marketing material Dyson uses to describe how their vacuum cleaners work) in product manuals, marketing materials, websites, newspapers, magazines, web forums etc. To produce these illustrations ideally the software should be easy to learn and use, reasonably accurate, and integrated.
Advances in the ease-of-use of Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) tools with single, unified simulation environments (such as Caedium) make it feasible for technical illustrators to incorporate simulation results directly into their work. Some level of simulation fidelity can be sacrificed in order to achieve rapid turnarounds – an illustration just has to look right and can sacrifice a little accuracy.
Next are the steps that a technical illustrator must consider to incorporate a simulation within their work.
Geometry is the basis of simulation within typical CAE tools. Any tool that wants to serve technical illustrators must be able to import geometry in a variety of formats. For instance, geometry could originate from a Computer-Aided Design (CAD) system in standard formats such as STEP (.stp) or IGES (.igs). Or it could also be exported from a 3D animation package (e.g., Blender) in popular formats such as 3DS or Alias/Wavefront (.obj).
The ability of a CAE tool to create addition geometry is also important, as rarely will the imported geometry be ideal for simulation or illustration purposes.
To manipulate the physics (such as airflow) to look right and be compatible with a technical illustrator's work process, a CAE tool needs to have interactive setup and rapid runtimes. A perfect result that requires a supercomputer and a week to obtain is useless in this context. Surface-based simulations (such as a panel method for airflow calculations) sacrifice accuracy for speed. By avoiding the need for an entire volume simulation, surface-based methods benefit from shorter setup times and shorter simulation runtimes.
At some level all simulations require a discrete geometry representation known as a mesh. Automated meshing routines alleviate an otherwise tedious and time-consuming step in the simulation process. Ideally, meshing is an invisible process performed within the context of creating simulation results.
The ability of a CAE tool to immediately display results such as contours, vectors and streamlines in the context of an airflow simulation is preferred over shuffling geometry and results backwards and forwards between a specialized visualization tool and a stand-alone simulation tool. After all, it is likely that additional geometry or simulation modifications will be necessary. It's much faster and more convenient to perform these modifications within a single, unified simulation environment.
Adding details, such as brand logos, to models within an illustration can enhance realism and is easily accomplished with texture mapping. Just like adding decals to an Airfix plastic model, texture mapping adds realistic details without increasing model complexity.
With the Internet age it is now easy to share files and so it is feasible to share a technical illustration as an interactive 3D illustration for a specialized viewer or in a more general format such as VRML embedded within a web browser.
The final phase of most illustrations is to set up lighting and perform a final high-quality render. If visual realism is important, then a ray tracing tool, such as POV-Ray, can be used. If non-photorealistic rendering is preferred (such as cartoon-like outlining) then the Renderman format is a good choice which can be rendered by a tool such as Aqsis.
With a final 3D illustration in hand, it might be necessary to combine it with a collage of other illustrations, which can be accomplished using dedicated photo-editing tools such as GIMP. For something a little different, 3D renderings could be used as texture maps embedded within another 3D illustration.
Have a Go
With CAE tools that are able to simply perform simulations and produce high quality 3D illustrations the options available are only limited by your imagination – so dream away.
Caedium, combined with our affordable Professional add-on, is an ideal system to produce technical illustrations based on airflow simulations. It satisfies all the requirements outlined in this article and, with our free 30 day trial, there's every reason to give it a go.
Recent blog posts
- How to Share Caedium CFD Results With ixCube 4-10
- CFD For A Complete Dust Collector
- Navier-Stokes Equations NOT Renamed
- Navier-Stokes Equations Renamed
- Remote CFD is Easy
- CFD Simulation of Airflow Through Filters in a Dust Collector
- CFD Analysis of a Homemade Cyclone
- CFD Analysis of a Blower for a Small Dust Collector
- Fluid Device Design is Like Herding Cats So Let CFD Help
- Reduced Complexity 3D Models for CFD