Turning Vanes Required
Do you want turning vanes with your duct work? Yes, if you are considering a square corner and you want to minimize your fan power requirement. Don't take my word for it, instead consider this Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) study that compares a vaneless square corner with both small turning vanes and large turning vanes.
Velocity magnitude contours on the symmetry plane
The velocity magnitude contours on the symmetry plane of each configuration show recirculation zones (blue) downstream of the corner. Notice how the zone reduces in size with the introduction of the turning vanes and is smallest for the large turning vanes. You can also see that the maximum flow velocity (red) is reduced adjacent to the recirculation with the turning vanes, even though each simulation maintains the same volume flow rate.
How does this seemingly improved flow pattern for the turning vanes translate into actual savings? The pressure drop for the large turning vanes is a whopping 62% less than the vaneless corner. Given that you select a fan based on the system pressure drop and the volume flow rate, the large turning vanes will save you power and equipment costs. What's not to like?
- Interesting discussion on turning vanes: "Turning Vanes: Necessary Component, or Efficiency Reduction Device?"
- CFD simulations were created and performed using Caedium Professional
Recent blog posts
- All CFD Should Be Upfront CFD
- Speed Up CFD with Symmetry and Cyclic Conditions
- Airships Rising
- World Cup Stadium Aerodynamics with CFD
- World Cup Balls
- Tower Bridge Meets CFD
- How to Make a Splash in CFD
- Caedium CFD Sneak Peek: Passive Species Transport
- Automated Creation and Export of CFD Results
- Aerodynamics Plays No Role in the Performance of Stationary Bicycles