World Cup Balls
Every 4 years the FIFA World Cup rolls around and the question on everyone's lips is...how will the official match balls behave? Oh, and to a lesser degree, which nation will win? Ball aerodynamics are complex, but relatively well understood. Given the typical speed and spin of balls in the beautiful game, small changes to their surface texture (the focus of much recent effort in ball design) can have dramatic repercussions on their trajectories and hang times. Balls are deemed so important that each has its own Wikipedia page and each has tournament-flavored names thanks to Adidas, the long time ball designer.
The Fevernova ball starred at the 2002 World Cup in Korea/Japan. Underneath the smooth outer surface consisting of stitched hexagonal panels was a layer of foam and a knitted chassis. The idea behind the innovative inner construction was to provide precise and therefore predictable trajectory control.
Criticism flowed, citing that the ball was too light, and it was even blamed for unexpected team exits during the tournament.
The +Teamgeist ball used at the 2006 World Cup in Germany was the first tournament ball to use thermal bonding rather than stitching for the outer skin of the ball. The advantage of bonding was cited as a rounder ball that would produce more predictable performance. The smooth surface was almost waterproof.
KandschwarImage license: Creative Commons CC BY-SA 3.0,
Players weren't happy, claiming the ball was again too light and changed its behavior markedly when wet. Do you notice a pattern here?
At the 2010 World Cup in South Africa, controversy swirled yet again around the design of the Jabulani ball. As with the previous edition of the World Cup ball, the Jabulani used thermal bonds to join the outer panels. Also the ball had a high-tech textured finish known as Grip 'n' Groove, which was more subtle than the dimples on a golf ball - being a variation on a riblet texture.
Image courtesy of University of Adelaide
It was almost universally panned by World Cup players, especially goalkeepers. By implication, if it was difficult for goalkeepers to predict the balls trajectory, then we should have seen more goals than in previous tournaments. Instead we saw the lowest number of total goals ever at 145 in the expanded nation (32) World Cup era that started in 1998.
The theme of the Brazuca ball for the latest 2014 World Cup in Brazil was testing, testing, and more testing. The ball was developed over 2 years, in which time it was tested at a number of tournaments and for friendly international matches, cunningly disguised as another ball. It features a new panel design and a new textured finish compared to its ill received 2010 counterpart.
Creative Commons CC BY-SA 3.0Image license:
With the start of the 2014 World Cup imminent there doesn't appear to be any player dissent on the performance of the ball. Maybe we'll just have to wait until after the tournament for the lowly ball to yet again bear the brunt of player criticism for poor performances.
Recent blog posts
- Speed Up CFD with Symmetry and Cyclic Conditions
- Airships Rising
- World Cup Stadium Aerodynamics with CFD
- World Cup Balls
- Tower Bridge Meets CFD
- How to Make a Splash in CFD
- Caedium CFD Sneak Peek: Passive Species Transport
- Automated Creation and Export of CFD Results
- Aerodynamics Plays No Role in the Performance of Stationary Bicycles
- Aerodynamic Performance of a Stationary Bicycle