Never Settle For Facets
Submitted by Richard Smith on August 23, 2016 - 14:15
Don't settle for Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software that uses (abuses) facets (e.g., STL) as geometry. If your original geometry is analytic (CAD) then mesh it directly without the conversion to facets. Otherwise it's like you have to create two surface meshes. What's wrong with that? Plenty!
Dartmouth clock tower undergoing renovation aided by blocky scaffolding
If blocky (Minecraft) shapes ruled the world, then CFD with facets would be easy. Alas, not to be, as the world prefers curves.
To find out more see:
Recent blog posts
- CFD Simulates Distant Past
- Background on the Caedium v6.0 Release
- Long-Necked Dinosaurs Succumb To CFD
- CFD Provides Insight Into Mystery Fossils
- Wind Turbine Design According to Insects
- Runners Discover Drafting
- Wind Tunnel and CFD Reveal Best Cycling Tuck
- Active Aerodynamics on the Lamborghini Huracán Performante
- Fluidic Logic
- Stonehenge Vortex Revealed as April Fools' Day Distortion Field
Comments
Re: Never Settle For Facets
Richard,
Excellent discussion and I completely agree. I wrote a blog post about this at my past employer, Pointwise:
http://www.pointwise.com/theconnector/September-2012/Analytic-vs-Discret...
Keep up the good articles, Chris